From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11024 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2011 19:15:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 11014 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Apr 2011 19:15:43 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:15:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3TJFNfC015290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:15:23 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p3TJFNjC006296; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:15:23 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p3TJFMJ1022110; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 15:15:22 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E01D2378304; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 13:15:21 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Andrew Gontarek Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bug 12705: Extremely poor performance when printing large arrays References: <4DB70027.2040006@cray.com> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 19:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:41:23 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-04/txt/msg00566.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I am running this through our tester, and if it works ok I am going to Tom> check it in. It looks safe enough for 7.3 as well. I am checking it in now. Tom