From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28751 invoked by alias); 18 Jul 2011 16:52:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 28741 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Jul 2011 16:51:59 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:51:30 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6IGpS0q030714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:51:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6IGpSlf026805; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:51:28 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6IGpQ5u015593; Mon, 18 Jul 2011 12:51:27 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Daniel Jacobowitz Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [1/4] RFC: skip DIEs which only declare an enum References: Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2011 18:02:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2011 14:27:46 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00426.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> Generally speaking, I agree with your sentiment. Can't you Daniel> forward-declare enums in the latest C++ draft, though? Yes, thanks for pointing that out. The F15 g++ accepts this translation unit with -std=c++0x: enum x : int; enum x a; This generates: <1><1d>: Abbrev Number: 2 (DW_TAG_enumeration_type) <1e> DW_AT_name : x <20> DW_AT_declaration : 1 <21> DW_AT_byte_size : 4 <22> DW_AT_decl_file : 1 <23> DW_AT_decl_line : 1 I am going withdraw this patch and look at other ways to fix this problem. Tom