From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27665 invoked by alias); 1 Nov 2011 18:55:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 27645 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Nov 2011 18:55:40 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:55:27 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pA1ItJpG008354 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:55:24 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA1HIrIj031067; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:18:53 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pA1HIpTN026569; Tue, 1 Nov 2011 13:18:51 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Mike Stump Cc: Mike Frysinger , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: remote-sim.h References: <42696E6D-92F3-4F66-B2C9-D79C76B12D2F@comcast.net> <201110312354.53063.vapier@gentoo.org> <593EB847-F177-4D84-8DB3-30064C53907E@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 18:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <593EB847-F177-4D84-8DB3-30064C53907E@comcast.net> (Mike Stump's message of "Mon, 31 Oct 2011 22:38:29 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00026.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Stump writes: Mike> Indeed, bfd_vma would work just fine for me. (I only have 64-bit Mike> pointers, and only have one target). I don't know this code, but the comment in remote-sim.h indicates it is trying to use the same type as gdb, and the current gdb/defs.h says: typedef bfd_vma CORE_ADDR; remote-sim.h is the only reference I see to CORE_ADDR_TYPE. I don't know the history but replacing it with bfd_vma seems like the right thing. Tom