From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21746 invoked by alias); 21 Nov 2011 16:15:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 21727 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Nov 2011 16:15:32 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_BJ X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:15:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pALGFCwE028566 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:15:13 -0500 Received: from psique (ovpn-112-31.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.112.31]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pALGF6Sk029406; Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:15:10 -0500 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement new `info core mappings' command References: <20111031001117.GA11608@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111031070012.GA32610@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111104162648.GA30571@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111109203148.GA19625@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Sergio Durigan Junior's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2011 02:10:03 -0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2 Sergio Durigan Junior writes: > Jan Kratochvil writes: > >> On Tue, 08 Nov 2011 02:48:54 +0100, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> > On Thu, 03 Nov 2011 21:00:39 +0100, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: >>> > For ELF core files you should rather check also the ELF segments in >>> > objfiles->obfd and verify it is fully covered. >> [...] >>> This one is giving me headaches... >> >> So I understand in some corner cases without ABRT `info core mappings' may be >> useful but I no longer find too much interest in it myself and some >> approximate file suggestion may be just good enough there. After all the >> whole information about where is which file mapped is just an approximate >> suggestion by GDB anyway. > > Ok, so I would like to ask for another round of review of this patch > then. I am aware of Ulrich's work towards a new `info mappings' > command, but since I've got no response from him yet, I decided to > continue my efforts here. Ping.