From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-87179-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 27714 invoked by alias); 16 Jan 2012 20:27:28 -0000
Received: (qmail 27706 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jan 2012 20:27:26 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:27:11 +0000
Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0GJSll8028357	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 14:28:58 -0500
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q0GHk7jn006765;	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:46:07 -0500
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id q0GHk5Eo025609;	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 12:46:05 -0500
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Cc: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/8] Language independent bits
References: <m3k44s7qej.fsf@gmail.com> <m3aa5o7q3k.fsf@gmail.com>	<20120115203420.GA18901@host2.jankratochvil.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 20:40:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <20120115203420.GA18901@host2.jankratochvil.net> (Jan	Kratochvil's message of "Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:34:20 +0100")
Message-ID: <m3obu3pmle.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-01/txt/msg00576.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com> writes:

>> +    int expout_size;
Jan> Memory object size does not fit into `int', it should be `size_t'.

I agree, but I think that mixing different kinds of refactorings into
one patch can be unnecessarily complicated and confusing.  The 'int' is
already there today.

Tom