From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32318 invoked by alias); 13 May 2002 08:48:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 32289 invoked from network); 13 May 2002 08:48:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dell-paw-2.cambridge.redhat.com) (195.224.55.226) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 13 May 2002 08:48:38 -0000 Received: from north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com (host217-35-6-237.in-addr.btopenworld.com [217.35.6.237]) by dell-paw-2.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAEF2B560; Mon, 13 May 2002 09:48:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by north-pole.nickc.cambridge.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD1B1C395; Mon, 13 May 2002 09:48:27 +0100 (BST) To: thorpej@wasabisystems.com Cc: binutils@sources.redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFA] Include sh64 support for shle-*-netbsdelf* References: <20020511115603.W3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> From: Nick Clifton Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 01:48:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20020511115603.W3435@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2002-05/txt/msg00450.txt.bz2 Hi Jason, > sh64 support is already present for sh-*-netbsdelf*, but shle-*-netbsdelf* > was apparently missed when this was added. > > This patch is necessary in order to build GDB for shle-*-netbsdelf*, now > that sh64 support has been added to GDB. > > OK to commit? > > bfd: > * config.bfd (shle-*-netbsdelf*): Add target which includes > sh64 support. See below, > opcodes: > * configure.in (shle-*-*elf*): Include sh64 support. > * configure: Regenerate. Approved - please apply. > Index: bfd/config.bfd > =================================================================== > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/config.bfd,v > retrieving revision 1.89 > diff -u -r1.89 config.bfd > --- bfd/config.bfd 11 May 2002 09:10:14 -0000 1.89 > +++ bfd/config.bfd 11 May 2002 18:42:46 -0000 > @@ -879,6 +879,13 @@ > targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlin_vec > ;; > > + shle-*-netbsdelf*) > + targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlnbsd_vec > + targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shnbsd_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec" > +#ifdef BFD64 > + targ_selvecs="${targ_selvecs} bfd_elf32_sh64_vec bfd_elf32_sh64l_vec bfd_elf64_sh64_vec bfd_elf64_sh64l_vec" > +#endif > + ;; > sh*le-*-netbsdelf*) > targ_defvec=bfd_elf32_shlnbsd_vec > targ_selvecs="bfd_elf32_shnbsd_vec shcoff_vec shlcoff_vec" Doesn't the "sh*le-*-netbsdelf*" target (immediately below the lines you have added) already cover this situation ? Cheers Nick