From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13982 invoked by alias); 24 Oct 2007 17:12:44 -0000 Received: (qmail 13952 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Oct 2007 17:12:41 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:12:38 +0000 Received: (qmail 25950 invoked from network); 24 Oct 2007 17:12:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 24 Oct 2007 17:12:36 -0000 To: Carlos O'Donell Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org, Daniel Jacobowitz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix uninitialized use of variables. References: <20071020172137.GC28823@lios> From: Jim Blandy Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 17:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jim Blandy's message of "Tue, 23 Oct 2007 16:20:12 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-10/txt/msg00590.txt.bz2 Jim Blandy writes: > Carlos O'Donell writes: >> Index: gdb/remote.c >> =================================================================== >> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/remote.c,v >> retrieving revision 1.271 >> diff -u -p -r1.271 remote.c >> --- gdb/remote.c 8 Oct 2007 12:55:09 -0000 1.271 >> +++ gdb/remote.c 18 Oct 2007 16:34:05 -0000 >> @@ -1343,7 +1343,8 @@ unpack_varlen_hex (char *buff, /* packet >> static char * >> unpack_nibble (char *buf, int *val) >> { >> - ishex (*buf++, val); >> + if (!ishex (*buf++, val)) >> + error (_("Unpacked nibble does not contain hex characters.")); >> return buf; >> } > > This looks fine to me, although Daniel has thoughts on error handling > in the remote protocol that I don't fully understand. > > But the error message is going to be obscure to users. It should at > least say something about the remote protocol packet being misformed. You know, I can't see any harm in this change, whatever the remote.c big picture is. If you can make the error message something more helpful, please commit.