From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1346 invoked by alias); 8 Nov 2007 16:14:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 1338 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Nov 2007 16:14:40 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail.codesourcery.com (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.4) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:14:39 +0000 Received: (qmail 26571 invoked from network); 8 Nov 2007 16:14:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jimb@127.0.0.2) by mail.codesourcery.com with ESMTPA; 8 Nov 2007 16:14:37 -0000 To: Vladimir Prus Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Cleanup pending breakpoints floatsam References: <200711081155.47340.ghost@cs.msu.su> From: Jim Blandy Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 16:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200711081155.47340.ghost@cs.msu.su> (Vladimir Prus's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2007 11:55:46 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-11/txt/msg00172.txt.bz2 Vladimir Prus writes: > After pending breakpoints were changed for better, a number of > functions have 'pending_bp' parameter that is not used in any > way. This patch removes it. OK? > > (I'll write ChangeLog entry if this patch is approved) Looks good to me; please commit. (This patch was mechanical and touched a number of functions, so I can understand why you'd rather put off writing the ChangeLog entry for it. But in general, a patch should be posted with a ChangeLog entry: it helps reviewers understand the patch, and of course the entry is subject to review itself.)