From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20118 invoked by alias); 23 Oct 2008 15:17:01 -0000 Received: (qmail 20106 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Oct 2008 15:16:59 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:16:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NFFtWp025326; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:15:55 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m9NFFsXr031451; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:15:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-67.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.67]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9NFFsRa001873; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 11:15:54 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7FAC688810D; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 09:15:53 -0600 (MDT) To: Rob Quill Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Convenience functions References: <8f2776cb0801301557t2e265b62u56d6df7cbcec1c84@mail.gmail.com> <20081023134150.GA21234@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 15:17:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20081023134150.GA21234@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Thu\, 23 Oct 2008 09\:41\:50 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-10/txt/msg00573.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> [Preachy interlude: splitting up patches good! posting unrelated Daniel> patches at the bottom of threads bad! Until Tom mentioned it on IRC Daniel> this week I'd completely forgotten this patch had been posted.] Yeah, well... I sent this as a convenience to Rob, not as a real submission. It isn't actually useful for anything in this form. Daniel> I looked through this patch, since I have another use for it too. It Daniel> looks fine to me, except that of course it is missing documentation Daniel> and test cases. For test cases we'd need a function to test with; Daniel> perhaps Rob's? Exactly :) Tom