From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25653 invoked by alias); 15 Dec 2010 20:51:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 25646 invoked by uid 22791); 15 Dec 2010 20:51:54 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:51:49 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBFKpa8v011848 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:51:36 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBFKpY0A022594; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:51:35 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBFKpYSo027498; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:51:34 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C1D8B379182; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:51:33 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: pmuldoon@redhat.com Cc: Doug Evans , pedro@codesourcery.com, eliz@gnu.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] Add an evaluation function hook to Python breakpoints. References: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:51:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Phil Muldoon's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:34:18 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00324.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: Phil> + struct cleanup *cleanup = ensure_python_env (get_current_arch (), Phil> + current_language); I didn't notice this before. I think this should use the breakpoint's arch and language. Phil> + if (PyObject_HasAttrString (py_bp, method)) Phil> + { Phil> + PyObject *result = PyObject_CallMethod (py_bp, method, NULL); Since we're now overloading the "condition" member, what happens if the user sets a condition on the breakpoint? I think we may need an additional check here, to see if the "condition" member is a callable object. Tom