From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16403 invoked by alias); 18 Feb 2011 15:14:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 16392 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Feb 2011 15:14:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:14:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1IFEZxS028783 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:14:35 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1IFEZxJ005529; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:14:35 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p1IFEYLt013643; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 10:14:35 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9039F378509; Fri, 18 Feb 2011 08:14:34 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Yao Qi Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [common] Merge duplicated macros in linux-nat.c and linux-low.c References: <4D5E2021.2070107@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:24:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4D5E2021.2070107@codesourcery.com> (Yao Qi's message of "Fri, 18 Feb 2011 15:30:41 +0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-02/txt/msg00463.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Yao" == Yao Qi writes: Yao> Note that the dependency tracking in gdbserver is not done in this Yao> patch. Why not? It seems like it should be. Tom