From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15161 invoked by alias); 3 Aug 2011 18:36:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 15133 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Aug 2011 18:36:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:36:20 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p73IaIuA016173 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:36:18 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p73IaHP8009893; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:36:17 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p73IaFuP001116; Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:36:16 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Jakub Jelinek , Eli Zaretskii , drow@false.org, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC 06/12] entryval: Display @entry parameters in bt full References: <20110718201852.GG30496@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110719103055.GA21344@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110719114148.GA14146@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20110803172725.GA9502@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 18:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110803172725.GA9502@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 3 Aug 2011 19:27:25 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Jan> Is there an agreement upon the output below? I think it is very good. Tom