From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21004 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2011 15:11:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 20990 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2011 15:11:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:10:53 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p75FAiSc013608 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:10:44 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p75FAig3019572; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:10:44 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p75FAgd5030330; Fri, 5 Aug 2011 11:10:43 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Eliminate tui_command_loop References: <201108042110.45405.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201108051402.06224.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2011 15:11:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201108051402.06224.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Fri, 5 Aug 2011 14:02:05 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-08/txt/msg00115.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> deprecated_command_loop_hook is used by insight. Pedro> Sounds like we could get rid of it, and make insight Pedro> install a command_loop_proc callback in its interpreter. Pedro> (gdb/gdbtk/gdbtk-interp.c). Yeah, I think that would be an improvement. The fewer functions with "deprecated" in the name, the better. Tom