From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84327-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 21345 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2011 19:36:37 -0000
Received: (qmail 21297 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2011 19:36:36 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:36:21 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9BJaJh7016179	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:36:20 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9BJaJ8w010019;	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:36:19 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9BJaIK1005523;	Tue, 11 Oct 2011 15:36:18 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: "gdb-patches\@sourceware.org ml" <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: Re: [RFA] c++/13225
References: <4E9495DB.8010109@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 19:36:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <4E9495DB.8010109@redhat.com> (Keith Seitz's message of "Tue, 11	Oct 2011 12:15:39 -0700")
Message-ID: <m3mxd78gnh.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00330.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Keith" == Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com> writes:

Keith> This occurs because the parser interprets "0" as an integer, and the
Keith> evaluator does not allow integer to pointer conversion. I cannot
Keith> really think of a reason why gdb shouldn't be more permissive of this,
Keith> as long as the INT will fit into a pointer.

Sami updated overloading resolution to more faithfully follow the C++
spec.  So, I think it would be useful to justify this patch in terms of
the standard.

Tom