From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12458 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2011 14:10:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 12436 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Nov 2011 14:10:13 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:09:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAIE9wNf020431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:09:58 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAIE9vwR009934; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:09:57 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pAIE9uj7024280; Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:09:56 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFA: implement ambiguous linespec proposal References: <20111028221459.GA28467@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111104074543.GA13839@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20111116000842.GA30589@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 14:10:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:45:58 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00497.txt.bz2 Jan> Still more time could give more reviews, for whatever reason I for Jan> example haven't yet run a regression test on `break'ing on all Jan> symbols of Fedora .debug files which found regressions in Keith's Jan> patchset, also I haven't yet found energy for the full review for Jan> whatever reason. Tom> I'll try this test against the debuginfo I have installed here. I ran it against a big C++ library, libwebkitgtk. This took long enough that I don't think I want to run it against everything. This revealed one pre-existing bug, but nothing specific to my patch: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13417 Tom