From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13546 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 15:38:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 13378 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 15:38:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:38:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pATFc0hB010764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:38:00 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pATFc0L4023140; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:38:00 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pATFbwSw025547; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:37:59 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: GDB 7.4 branching status? (2011-11-23) References: <20111123163917.GA13809@adacore.com> <20111123232406.GQ13809@adacore.com> <20111124105603.GA91879@adacore.com> <20111124163304.GR13809@adacore.com> <20111129032202.GQ24943@adacore.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 15:38:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111129032202.GQ24943@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 28 Nov 2011 19:22:02 -0800") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00818.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> This patch is optional, and related to the problem that got fixed Joel> by your latest patch series, mentioned in my previous email: Joel> http://www.sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2011-11/msg00799.html Joel> I still noticed a call to skip_prologue_sal without a check of Joel> self-> funfirstline. Joel> Perhaps there is no situation where this might make a difference, Joel> but I thought it might be good to add the check anyways, just Joel> to be on the safe side. I am going to roll this into my patch. Tom