From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12214 invoked by alias); 21 Dec 2011 17:16:22 -0000 Received: (qmail 12203 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Dec 2011 17:16:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:16:07 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBLHFhlV002741 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:15:43 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBLHFhY5022868; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:15:43 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBLHFfCo016032; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 12:15:41 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: ams@gnu.org Cc: Joel Brobecker , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, alves.ped@gmail.com Subject: Re: [RFC] a script to update our gnulib import... References: <20111212001426.GG2748@adacore.com> <201112121153.19159.pedro@codesourcery.com> <20111219065256.GR21915@adacore.com> <20111220053157.GV21915@adacore.com> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 17:25:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Alfred M. Szmidt's message of "Tue, 20 Dec 2011 18:08:10 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00735.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Alfred" == Alfred M Szmidt writes: Alfred> I'll look at it this week, and see that for example the gdb/gnulib/ Alfred> directory doesn't have to be checked in. Yeah, it does. GDB -- and more generally, the gcc and src trees -- have long had the rule that most generated files, especially those required for configury -- are checked in, and AM_MAINTAINER_MODE is used in configure. Tom