From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-93367-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17807 invoked by alias); 31 Jul 2012 21:26:06 -0000
Received: (qmail 17770 invoked by uid 22791); 31 Jul 2012 21:26:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.3 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_XF,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:25:36 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6VLPaWB029440	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)	for <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:25:36 -0400
Received: from psique (ovpn-113-52.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.52])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q6VLPXSp029190;	Tue, 31 Jul 2012 17:25:34 -0400
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: GDB Patches <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Adjust `pc-fp.exp' for ppc64/s390x (PR 12659)
X-URL: http://www.redhat.com
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 21:26:00 -0000
Message-ID: <m3mx2fmxmb.fsf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-07/txt/msg00823.txt.bz2

While regtesting 7.4 against 7.5 branch on ppc64/s390x RHEL 6.3, I
noticed this failure.  The patch which introduced this failure was
committed because of:

      http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659

On x86*, the output of `info register pc fp' is:

    info register pc fp
    pc: 0x400520
    fp: 0x7fffffffc490
    (gdb) PASS: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp

On ppc64/s390x, it is:

    info register pc fp
    pc             0x10000658       0x10000658 <main+20>
    fp: 0xfffffffd120
    (gdb) FAIL: gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: info register pc fp

Since this difference in the output does not seem to be an error itself,
the patch below just adjusts the testcase to match this kind of output
as well.  It does not fail on x86*.

OK?

-- 
Sergio

gdb/testsuite:
2012-07-31  Sergio Durigan Junior  <sergiodj@redhat.com>

	PR gdb/12659:
	Adjust testcase for PPC64/s390x architectures.
	* gdb.base/pc-fp.exp: Match different output for `info register pc
	fp' on PPC64/s390x architectures.

Index: src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
===================================================================
--- src.orig/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
+++ src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/pc-fp.exp
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ gdb_test "info register \$fp" "${valueof
 # Regression test for
 # http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12659
 gdb_test "info register pc fp" \
-    "pc: ${valueof_pc}\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"
+    "pc(:)?.*${valueof_pc}(.*${hex} <.*>)?\[\r\n\]+fp: ${valueof_fp}\[\r\n\]+"