From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21317 invoked by alias); 10 Jun 2009 16:40:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 21294 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Jun 2009 16:40:02 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:39:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5AGdme4003504; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:39:48 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n5AGdljk020728; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:39:47 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-36.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.36]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n5AGdksP031476; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 12:39:46 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C6C16486A3; Wed, 10 Jun 2009 10:39:42 -0600 (MDT) To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [01/15] Introduce get_current_arch () function References: <200906101536.n5AFaEDM000676@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 16:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200906101536.n5AFaEDM000676@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Wed\, 10 Jun 2009 17\:36\:14 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00261.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand writes: Ulrich> There wouldn't really be much of a difference today, as the architecture Ulrich> of val_args[i] is the architecture of the expression from which it was Ulrich> evaluated, which is likewise get_current_arch (). Is that true even if the expression is something like "$var"? I did not read the patch series *that* closely, but I would have assumed that the arch of the resulting value would come directly from the convenience variable's value -- which could be anything. Tom