From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17505 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2009 17:43:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 17495 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Dec 2009 17:43:44 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:43:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB8HhFAO032272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:43:15 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB8HhE2n007984; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:43:14 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id nB8HhDQq029305; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 12:43:13 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2365D3782A2; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 10:43:12 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: Michael Snyder , Hui Zhu , gdb-patches ml , Mark Kettenis Subject: Re: [RFA] Prec x86 MMX 3DNow! SSE SSE2 SSE3 SSSE3 SSE4 support References: <4B1D3829.2020509@vmware.com> <20091207174317.GF2891@adacore.com> <4B1D4152.7000200@vmware.com> <20091207180036.GG2891@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 17:43:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20091207180036.GG2891@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 7 Dec 2009 19:00:36 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-12/txt/msg00120.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: >> >Let's avoid that extension, as GDB is supposed to be buildable with >> >a non-GCC compiler. >> >> I thought we had given up that requirement? Joel> You might be right, but I don't remember us making that decision. Joel> Anyone remembers? I have never heard that. We do use GCC features sometimes, but always conditionally; e.g., look for __GNUC__ in defs.h. Tom