From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28246 invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2010 18:15:29 -0000 Received: (qmail 28238 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Jan 2010 18:15:28 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:15:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0BIEvmp019568 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:14:58 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0BIEuss006130; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:14:57 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o0BIEuSg018372; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 13:14:56 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id C6C51378190; Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:14:55 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Joel Brobecker Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA/DWARF] Add DW_AT_GNAT_descriptive_type support References: <20091224180657.GV5942@adacore.com> <20100111104102.GG2007@adacore.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 18:15:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100111104102.GG2007@adacore.com> (Joel Brobecker's message of "Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:41:02 +0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-01/txt/msg00266.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Joel" == Joel Brobecker writes: Joel> Tested on x86_64-linux. No regression, just one expected change. Joel> I think this addresses both of Tom's comments, but I'm going to wait Joel> a little for confirmation and/or last second objections. FWIW, I skimmed through it and nothing jumped out at me. Tom