From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82464-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 11261 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 18:38:41 -0000
Received: (qmail 11253 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 18:38:40 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:38:25 +0000
Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KIcO37007089	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:24 -0400
Received: from psique ([10.3.112.15])	by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KIcGQv015313;	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:20 -0400
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: RFC: partially available registers
References: <m3vcv6xegp.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAN9gPaFFX0H4tONNL27GCwCtpPoLCtjs5HpS7sXaLSM-wjctSw@mail.gmail.com>	<m3sjq79soa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:49:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <m3sjq79soa.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Fri,	15 Jul 2011 14:48:21 -0600")
Message-ID: <m3livsg5m0.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00559.txt.bz2

Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com> writes:

> I find gdbarch.sh very hard to read.  Does anybody else?

FWIW, me too (remembering the `catch syscall' days...).