From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26237 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2011 16:18:26 -0000 Received: (qmail 26228 invoked by uid 22791); 11 Oct 2011 16:18:24 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:18:10 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9BGI94x002505 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:18:09 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9BGI9oq026335; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:18:09 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9BGI7hi019855; Tue, 11 Oct 2011 12:18:08 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Mark Kettenis Cc: davem@davemloft.net, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix jit.exp on most 32-bit targets. References: <20111010.225847.435074482632472630.davem@davemloft.net> <201110110929.p9B9Tsx2019112@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2011 16:18:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201110110929.p9B9Tsx2019112@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> (Mark Kettenis's message of "Tue, 11 Oct 2011 11:29:54 +0200 (CEST)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Kettenis writes: Mark> Somehow this feels wrong to me. But I guess it is too late to make Mark> the JIT people change the design of their interface :(. It could be done by bumping the version. But unless there is some fatal problem, gdb should accept the old versions anyhow. Tom