From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 14980 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2011 13:58:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 14970 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2011 13:58:06 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,TW_CP X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 13:57:47 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JDvkW0028830 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:57:46 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JDvj0T006014; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:57:45 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9JDviO0014957; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 09:57:44 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: Mark Kettenis , gdb-patches@sourceware.org, ppluzhnikov@google.com Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] Code cleanup: strcpy + strlen -> sprintf References: <20111018205108.GA31533@host1.jankratochvil.net> <201110182209.p9IM9o3F026010@glazunov.sibelius.xs4all.nl> <20111019082833.GA8886@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 14:08:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20111019082833.GA8886@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:28:33 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00527.txt.bz2 Jan> I am unfamiliar with gdbserver but there is no single use of snprintf while Jan> 75 uses of sprintf. Isn't it for some platform compatibility? The gnulib page is informative: http://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/gnulib/snprintf.html Tom