From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 27384 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2012 22:32:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 27373 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Aug 2012 22:32:04 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:31:44 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OMVgkH022249 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:31:42 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-26.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.26]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q7OMVdS2004075; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 18:31:41 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Aaron Gamble Cc: Tom Tromey , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [patch] info threads sort by name and name regex matching References: <87pq6isqt9.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87pq6hppiz.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> <87obm0jhpi.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:32:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Aaron Gamble's message of "Fri, 24 Aug 2012 15:23:21 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-IsSubscribed: yes Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-08/txt/msg00775.txt.bz2 On Friday, August 24 2012, Aaron Gamble wrote: > On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Tom Tromey wrote: >> >>>>>>> "Aaron" == Aaron Gamble writes: >> >> Aaron> -a enables sorting by thread name >> >> Is '-a' mnemonic for something? > -a is for alphabetical. Would -s be more appropriate? I prefer `-a' FWIW. I could understand that it meant `alphabetical' since the beginning, and I could not find any convention for this on GNU manuals. BTW, `-s' is for `string'? This time I didn't understand it :-). -- Sergio