From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17689 invoked by alias); 3 Apr 2009 14:55:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 17678 invoked by uid 22791); 3 Apr 2009 14:55:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:55:25 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n33ErLpp029522; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:53:21 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n33ErIAs015745; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:53:19 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-63.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.63]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n33ErHOK000638; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 10:53:18 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2561C888031; Fri, 3 Apr 2009 08:53:16 -0600 (MDT) To: Jonas Maebe Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Borland fastcall support (i386) References: From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:55:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Jonas Maebe's message of "Fri\, 3 Apr 2009 15\:38\:13 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00063.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jonas" == Jonas Maebe writes: Jonas> b) one of the modified headers (include/elf/dwarf2.h) appears to be Jonas> imported from gcc, so I guess I should submit that change to gcc first Jonas> or instead? I recently noticed that the src and gcc versions of this file have diverged. Oops. It would be good to have just a single copy; most of the work to be done here is in the gcc repository. Jonas> c) the patch is against Archer rather than against CVS head (although Jonas> I don't know how different they are as far as the modified files are Jonas> concerned) The 'master' branch of Archer's git repository is updated from CVS head semi-regularly. If you are using some other branch, then yeah, there may be other changes in the way. Alternatively, you could also pull from the gdb git repository and use gdb/master, which I think is updated every half hour. Tom