From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3761 invoked by alias); 4 Jun 2009 20:34:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 3753 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Jun 2009 20:34:48 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:34:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n54KYWib022765; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:34:32 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n54KYUZO023957; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:34:31 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-161.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.161]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n54KYTRJ031281; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 16:34:30 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id A19A8378615; Thu, 4 Jun 2009 14:34:28 -0600 (MDT) To: Doug Evans Cc: Eli Zaretskii , gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] Fix too many "no debugging symbols found" warnings. References: <20090523232414.BED2B846C2@localhost> <83zld1swbi.fsf@gnu.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Thu, 04 Jun 2009 20:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Doug Evans's message of "Mon\, 25 May 2009 09\:07\:45 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00080.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Doug" =3D=3D Doug Evans writes: Eli> There's also a possibility to make this a tristate option instead of a Eli> simple boolean one. =C2=A0After all, it's quite possible that developm= ent Eli> snapshots of GDB were available on several GNU/Linux distros for some Eli> time, and so the argument of "new in GDB 7.0" is not necessarily Eli> strong enough. Doug> One thought I had was off/executable/on, [or whatever choices Doug> one prefers] but I discounted it as not being acceptable. If Doug> that's what y'all want, I'll resubmit another patch that does it Doug> that way. I also prefer the shorter, more generic name. Perhaps we'll want to add more values here later. The code changes look good to me. Tom