From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19054 invoked by alias); 10 Aug 2009 17:47:53 -0000 Received: (qmail 19045 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Aug 2009 17:47:53 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:47:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7AHlhbZ011924; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:47:43 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n7AHlg1b015644; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:47:42 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7AHlfp2016524; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:47:41 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 26FB237857D; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:47:41 -0600 (MDT) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: FYI: fix PR gdb/8869 References: <83fxc2n3dp.fsf@gnu.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:59:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83fxc2n3dp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat\, 08 Aug 2009 10\:58\:26 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00145.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Tom> I reasoned that only "set" commands could accept completers Eli> I hope this doesn't mean that "show" commands will not complete Eli> anymore, does it? The completer in question is used for the arguments to a command. "show" commands don't take arguments, AFAIK. So, there is no problem here. Perhaps I am misunderstanding you, though. What do you think would stop working? Tom