From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24826 invoked by alias); 10 Mar 2010 16:34:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 24812 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Mar 2010 16:34:29 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:34:21 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2AGYJaw006344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:34:19 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2AGYJWF015523; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:34:19 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2AGYICp009567; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:34:18 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id AA909378267; Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:34:17 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [2/2] RFC: let "commands" affect multiple breakpoints References: Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:54:28 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00385.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Tom" == Tom Tromey writes: Tom> I'd appreciate comments on this. Barring comments I will commit it Tom> soonish. It needs a doc review. Actually, this patch is a little half-baked. I forgot (sigh) to write any tests... so I won't be committing it until I do that. I do have a question though. With this change, gdb prints somewhat less nice text for "commands": Tom> + l = read_command_lines (_("Type commands for all specified breakpoints"), Tom> + info->from_tty, 1); Tom> - char *tmpbuf = xstrprintf ("Type commands for when breakpoint %d is hit, one per line.", Tom> - bnum); Any suggestions for something better here? Tom