From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32123 invoked by alias); 13 Apr 2010 21:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 32044 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Apr 2010 21:09:11 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:09:04 +0000 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DL92LQ003713 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:09:03 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DL92uG005358; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:09:02 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o3DL91QA029598; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:09:01 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 54864378887; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:09:01 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Phil Muldoon Cc: gdb-patches ml Subject: Re: [python][patch] PR pyton/11381 References: <4BBE1073.40703@redhat.com> <4BC4882C.8060601@redhat.com> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:09:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4BC4882C.8060601@redhat.com> (Phil Muldoon's message of "Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:05:16 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-04/txt/msg00431.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: Phil> I'm not sure what to do in the 'to_string' returns 'None' and the Phil> missing 'children' method above. I think it is fine as-is. People just shouldn't do this, just like they shouldn't write printers that fail in other weird ways. This patch is ok. Thanks. Tom