From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6510 invoked by alias); 16 Jun 2010 17:44:38 -0000 Received: (qmail 6499 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Jun 2010 17:44:37 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:44:31 +0000 Received: from int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.17]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5GHiTcB026699 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:44:29 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5GHiSB5025396; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:44:28 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o5GHiRwJ019557; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 13:44:28 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 9FBE4C88038; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 11:44:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [1/7] RFC: minimal BFD thread awareness References: <20100616173903.GB32701@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 17:44:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20100616173903.GB32701@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 16 Jun 2010 19:39:03 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-06/txt/msg00367.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: >> + "BFD_RELOC_SPU_PIC18", >> + "BFD_RELOC_SPU_STUB", Jan> Isn't this some leftover? It is just because somebody in the past forgot to "make headers". I will send that separately to binutils. Jan> I would prefer some opaque struct * typedefs so that the mutex vs. Jan> thread-id have incompatible types. I'll do that, thanks. Tom