From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24449 invoked by alias); 12 Aug 2010 19:34:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 24439 invoked by uid 22791); 12 Aug 2010 19:34:52 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:34:46 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7CJYafT028638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:34:36 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7CJYaHY017978; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:34:36 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o7CJYZbo031224; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:34:35 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 36B743781C7; Thu, 12 Aug 2010 13:34:35 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Pedro Alves Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFA] template names with arguments out of DW_AT_name References: <201007302017.41074.pedro@codesourcery.com> <201008112256.26755.pedro@codesourcery.com> Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 19:34:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <201008112256.26755.pedro@codesourcery.com> (Pedro Alves's message of "Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:56:25 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-08/txt/msg00179.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Pedro" == Pedro Alves writes: Pedro> I'd prefer to go with what we have for now and worry about Pedro> it later. Does that sound reasonable? Yes. Pedro> Below's the updated patch. Let me know what you think. Looks ok to me. Tom