From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29344 invoked by alias); 29 Nov 2011 19:01:34 -0000 Received: (qmail 29336 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Nov 2011 19:01:33 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:01:11 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pATJ18Vl022300 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:01:08 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pATJ17bn008297; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:01:08 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pATJ169M026671; Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:01:06 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: Kwok Cheung Yeung Cc: Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add the "-info-os" command to MI References: <4E970915.8000207@codesourcery.com> <4ECECFEB.8020807@codesourcery.com> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 19:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4ECECFEB.8020807@codesourcery.com> (Kwok Cheung Yeung's message of "Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:14:51 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-11/txt/msg00826.txt.bz2 >>>>> ">" == Kwok Cheung Yeung writes: >> I've now created a new mi_cmd_info_os function to service -info-os, >> which delegates to info_osdata_command in osdata.c. This is the same >> backend that 'info os' in the CLI uses, but at least now we don't go >> through the CLI code. >> info_osdata_command now needs to be non-static. Thanks for doing this. >> gdb/ >> * Makefile.in (SUBDIR_MI_OBS): Add mi-cmd-info.o. >> (SUBDIR_MI_SRCS): Add mi-cmd-info.c. >> (mi-cmd-info.o): New rule. >> * osdata.h: Add declaration for info_osdata_command. >> * osdata.c (info_osdata_command): Change to non-static. >> * mi/mi-cmds.c (mi_cmds): Add -info-os MI command. >> * mi/mi-cmd-info.c: New. Two nits... >> + { "info-os", { NULL, 0 }, mi_cmd_info_os}, mi_cmd_info_os doesn't seem to be declared anywhere. I think this ought to cause a compilation error. >> + info_osdata_command (argv [0], 0); No space before the '['. Tom