From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30682 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2008 15:22:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 30560 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2008 15:22:58 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:22:39 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m3AFMcRp004734 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:22:38 -0400 Received: from pobox.corp.redhat.com (pobox.corp.redhat.com [10.11.255.20]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3AFMb5c020940 for ; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:22:37 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-248-67.boston.redhat.com [10.13.248.67]) by pobox.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id m3AFMb6a019374; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 11:22:37 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 635F8378265; Thu, 10 Apr 2008 09:22:36 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Using bt command in async mode References: <18417.38670.195071.81191@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <20080410142029.GB21662@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey X-Attribution: Tom Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 15:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20080410142029.GB21662@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Thu\, 10 Apr 2008 10\:20\:29 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-04/txt/msg00192.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Daniel> Seems like this will be just as awkward in the long term, but Daniel> it's an improvement. Is there some other approach you'd prefer? Daniel> OK if it tested fine. I didn't run the test suite without the patch; I'll do that next week & check it in if it looks ok. Tom