From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30116 invoked by alias); 17 Feb 2009 20:50:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 30108 invoked by uid 22791); 17 Feb 2009 20:50:08 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:49:55 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1HKmpfo008885; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:51 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n1HKmpLd020304; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:51 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-13-59.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.13.59]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n1HKmnZh017373; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:48:49 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 94B6F88803F; Tue, 17 Feb 2009 13:48:45 -0700 (MST) To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: pedro@codesourcery.com, gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Modernize solaris threads support. References: <200902160549.49108.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200902162050.49191.pedro@codesourcery.com> <200902171310.24234.pedro@codesourcery.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:12:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue\, 17 Feb 2009 22\:37\:26 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-02/txt/msg00366.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Eli> It's a matter of personal preferences Thanks for explaining. Eli> I also dislike gratuitous changes in code that is there for at least 9 Eli> years. Describing other people's considered changes as gratuitous has a negative effect. I am sure Pedro did not think this was gratuitous when he wrote it; in fact, he explained why he did it. Tom