From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21250 invoked by alias); 8 Apr 2009 16:28:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 21241 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Apr 2009 16:28:57 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:28:52 +0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n38GSouP020506 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:28:50 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n38GSt7S007796 for ; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:28:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-14-2.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.14.2]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n38GSoQB004204; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 12:28:50 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id B7F6A3781B3; Wed, 8 Apr 2009 10:28:48 -0600 (MDT) To: =?utf-8?B?QW5kcsOpIFDDtm5pdHo=?= Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: Implement -exec-jump References: <200904080950.16691.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <200904081108.17248.vladimir@codesourcery.com> <837i1v627o.fsf@gnu.org> <200904081116.41983.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 16:28:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200904081116.41983.andre.poenitz@nokia.com> (=?utf-8?Q?=22An?= =?utf-8?Q?dr=C3=A9_P=C3=B6nitz=22's?= message of "Wed\, 8 Apr 2009 10\:16\:41 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00150.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Andr=C3=A9" =3D=3D Andr=C3=A9 P=C3=B6nitz = writes: Andr=C3=A9> [The opposite scenario, i.e. existing documentation, pointing t= o=20 Andr=C3=A9> unimplemented features, is much worse, though.] I agree that documenting unimplemented features is a bad practice. If you know of specific cases like this, please file a bug. I think we need a "documentation" component in Bugzilla, I'm surprised that there isn't one. Tom