From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26104 invoked by alias); 9 Jun 2009 17:04:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 25947 invoked by uid 22791); 9 Jun 2009 17:04:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:04:15 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59H4BGL008571; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:04:11 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n59H4AYr014563; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:04:10 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-99.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.99]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n59H48Ai006015; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 13:04:09 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2DD9D888077; Tue, 9 Jun 2009 11:04:08 -0600 (MDT) To: "Ulrich Weigand" Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [01/15] Introduce get_current_arch () function References: <200906091514.n59FElgC026768@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:04:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <200906091514.n59FElgC026768@d12av02.megacenter.de.ibm.com> (Ulrich Weigand's message of "Tue\, 9 Jun 2009 17\:14\:47 +0200 \(CEST\)") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-06/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Ulrich" == Ulrich Weigand writes: Ulrich> printf_command (char *arg, int from_tty) Ulrich> { Ulrich> + struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_current_arch (); I think that perhaps the printf command should use the arch from the values it is trying to print. Ulrich> struct type *wctype = lookup_typename (current_language, Ulrich> - current_gdbarch, Ulrich> + gdbarch, Ulrich> "wchar_t", NULL, 0); E.g., here it could use the architecture from val_args[i]. The benefit here would be that you could print out two wide strings, each from a different architecture, using a single printf. This seems like a reasonable thing to want to do. Tom