From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21201 invoked by alias); 21 Aug 2009 22:16:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 21191 invoked by uid 22791); 21 Aug 2009 22:16:31 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,J_CHICKENPOX_45,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:16:23 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7LMGKKU007108; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:16:20 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7LMGJDT009750; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:16:19 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n7LMGGuD009723; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 18:16:18 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id E76AD3782EF; Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:16:15 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Eli Zaretskii Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: RFC: allow breakpoints on labels References: <83tz02gwm2.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Tom Tromey Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:21:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <83tz02gwm2.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:37:25 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-08/txt/msg00350.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Eli" == Eli Zaretskii writes: Eli> The patch for the manual is fine. Thanks. Eli> As for the feature itself: I wonder if it would be possible to support Eli> FILE:LABEL and/or FUNCTION:LABEL as well. Since labels are local to Eli> the function in which they are used, just LABEL sounds too Eli> restrictive. I will look into it. FUNCTION:LABEL does seem natural to me, but linespec seems quite difficult to modify correctly, and from what I can see this would be a new syntax there. Tom