From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-70228-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 18649 invoked by alias); 16 Feb 2010 14:03:07 -0000
Received: (qmail 18329 invoked by uid 22791); 16 Feb 2010 14:03:05 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:03:04 +0000
Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1GE2tNA012935 	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); 	Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:02:55 -0500
Received: from hase.home (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) 	by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o1GE2p6o002636; 	Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:02:53 -0500
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@redhat.com>
To: ams@gnu.org
Cc: Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com>, binutils@sourceware.org,         gdb-patches@sourceware.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Remove config.cache files when reconfiguring at top level
References: <m3k4ue6a9i.fsf@redhat.com> <m3pr46u5ng.fsf@hase.home> 	<4B796E1D.7000104@redhat.com> <m2k4ue2x62.fsf@igel.home> 	<4B7A6E32.6070307__49868.1737961762$1266314832$gmane$org@redhat.com> 	<m3y6itsbr2.fsf@hase.home> <4B7A7B9E.4050606@redhat.com> 	<E1NhLWY-0003br-Qi@fencepost.gnu.org> <4B7A9233.5040008@redhat.com> 	<E1NhNQI-0002VY-To@fencepost.gnu.org>
X-Yow: FEELINGS are cascading over me!!!
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:03:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <E1NhNQI-0002VY-To@fencepost.gnu.org> (Alfred M. Szmidt's message 	of "Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:25:06 -0500")
Message-ID: <m3iq9xs2gk.fsf@hase.home>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2010-02/txt/msg00387.txt.bz2

"Alfred M. Szmidt" <ams@gnu.org> writes:

> I'd use -delete instead of `rm -f {} \;'.  But I think this is OK too.

-delete is a GNU extension.  But `-exec rm -f {} +' may be ok.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84  5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."