From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10642 invoked by alias); 24 Mar 2010 00:01:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 10479 invoked by uid 22791); 24 Mar 2010 00:01:07 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.4 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:01:01 +0000 Received: from int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2O00twK003952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:00:56 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2O00tDM027254; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:00:55 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o2O00sBS011627; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:00:54 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 074983780BA; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:00:54 -0600 (MDT) From: Tom Tromey To: Sami Wagiaalla Cc: GDB Patches Subject: Re: [patch] Backport memory leak fix to 7.1 References: <4BA8E6DC.7020701@redhat.com> Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 00:01:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <4BA8E6DC.7020701@redhat.com> (Sami Wagiaalla's message of "Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:05:48 -0400") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-03/txt/msg00805.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Sami" == Sami Wagiaalla writes: Sami> this is a combination of the patches posted Sami> here http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00124.html Sami> and here http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2010-03/msg00475.html Sami> and commited to HEAD I think it is fine to put these on the 7.1 branch, pending , but for future reference, it would be good to mention the reason. I have been following along PR 11408, but I'm not sure everybody has. Tom