From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9314 invoked by alias); 7 Dec 2010 18:14:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 9303 invoked by uid 22791); 7 Dec 2010 18:14:34 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:14:29 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB7IER87002078 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:14:27 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oB7IERAO029255; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:14:27 -0500 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oB7IEQeI017404; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:14:27 -0500 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7BBDD3780EF; Tue, 7 Dec 2010 11:14:26 -0700 (MST) From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Ping: unconditionally print detaching message References: <20101207075626.GB1257@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:14:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20101207075626.GB1257@host0.dyn.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Tue, 7 Dec 2010 08:56:26 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-12/txt/msg00071.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> So if it should be printed there should be IMO printed even the command Jan> + arguments. Yeah, that would be nice, if it isn't too hard. Jan> But the right way would be rather to use `set detach-on-fork off' Jan> by default when it would be working transparently enough. Jan> Therefore this message is no longer the right solution but just a Jan> temporary GDB deficiency workaround now. I do think this would be good. But, we seem to be quite a ways from it. What do you think of the "set print inferior" proposal I sent the other day? Tom