From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-84539-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 17522 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2011 20:52:00 -0000
Received: (qmail 17513 invoked by uid 22791); 19 Oct 2011 20:51:59 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.2 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:51:43 +0000
Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9JKphBC020106	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:51:43 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199])	by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9JKpg6L023067;	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:51:42 -0400
Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1])	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p9JKpf16017500;	Wed, 19 Oct 2011 16:51:41 -0400
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Python: fetch value when building gdb.Value object
References: <36B29E9D-F2B3-446F-AF8A-97254A3AAEE2@comcast.net>	<m3y5x0pxqg.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<21467A42-84A3-4DFD-83A9-28FFFB0A5C7F@comcast.net>	<m3y5wncpe0.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<2F165381-183F-471F-8F55-457F08E6B008@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 20:56:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <2F165381-183F-471F-8F55-457F08E6B008@comcast.net> (Paul Koning's	message of "Fri, 14 Oct 2011 16:29:54 -0400")
Message-ID: <m3ipnkso0y.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-10/txt/msg00542.txt.bz2

>>>>> "Paul" == Paul Koning <paulkoning@comcast.net> writes:

Paul> At this point the change has been approved and committed (that
Paul> happened before your comments arrived).  So I guess we have a question
Paul> of whether to change it back.

Yes, I think so.  I think the current approach is going to bite us
later.  We already have bugs open about bad memory management using
gdb.Value.

Tom