From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10873 invoked by alias); 13 Dec 2011 19:25:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 10858 invoked by uid 22791); 13 Dec 2011 19:25:16 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:24:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pBDJOwlF003710 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:24:58 -0500 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBDJOwd7005360; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:24:58 -0500 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id pBDJOunw028360; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:24:57 -0500 From: Tom Tromey To: pmuldoon@redhat.com Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [python] [patch] PR python/13329 References: Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 19:40:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Phil Muldoon's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2011 13:57:12 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.92 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-12/txt/msg00419.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Phil" == Phil Muldoon writes: Phil> The user command "set python print-stack" has not been published in a Phil> release so it is not compatible Ok, I see. I didn't remember that. I think you should just change the 'maint' one to follow. If you want you can add a compatibility mode, but it is up to you. I don't think we should promise any kind of compatibility around "maint" commands. Tom> You should leave in some compatibility tests for the old values. Phil> Do you mean use "maint set python print-stack" here? I did, but don't bother with that now. Tom