From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32348 invoked by alias); 4 Apr 2009 16:16:08 -0000 Received: (qmail 32063 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Apr 2009 16:16:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:15:58 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n34GFuYL026062 for ; Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:15:56 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n34GFuu1026269; Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:15:57 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-154.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.154]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n34GFt4h015669; Sat, 4 Apr 2009 12:15:55 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 7D7063784FB; Sat, 4 Apr 2009 10:15:52 -0600 (MDT) To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Python pretty-printing [1/6] References: <20090404033037.GA7157@caradoc.them.org> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: Tom Tromey In-Reply-To: <20090404033037.GA7157@caradoc.them.org> (Daniel Jacobowitz's message of "Fri\, 3 Apr 2009 23\:30\:37 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 16:16:00 -0000 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-04/txt/msg00093.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Jacobowitz writes: Tom> While testing this I discovered that the relocatable directory code in Tom> configure does not appear to actually work. This patch fixes this Tom> problem. Daniel> Could you expand on the problem? I can definitely say that it works; Daniel> we use it every day. There's no bug -- I was confused. Sorry about that. Tom