From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-67207-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14973 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2009 15:45:17 -0000
Received: (qmail 14956 invoked by uid 22791); 25 Sep 2009 15:45:16 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0 	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)     by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:45:11 +0000
Received: from int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) 	by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8PFj4ED027669; 	Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:45:05 -0400
Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) 	by int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8PFj3UP017715; 	Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:45:04 -0400
Received: from opsy.redhat.com (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) 	by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8PFj2mv004296; 	Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:45:03 -0400
Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) 	id 8E985378188; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:02 -0600 (MDT)
From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: =?utf-8?Q?S=C3=A9rgio?= Durigan =?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BAnior?=  <sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Doug Evans <dje@google.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Wording of "catch syscall <number>" warning
References: <20090925003107.87780843AC@ruffy.mtv.corp.google.com> 	<200909242257.11714.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 15:45:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <200909242257.11714.sergiodj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>  (=?utf-8?Q?=22S=C3=A9rgio?= Durigan 	=?utf-8?Q?J=C3=BAnior=22's?= message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2009 22:57:11 -0300")
Message-ID: <m3hbur2flt.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2009-09/txt/msg00802.txt.bz2

>>>>> "S=C3=A9rgio" =3D=3D S=C3=A9rgio Durigan J=C3=BAnior <sergiodj@linux.=
vnet.ibm.com> writes:

S=C3=A9rgio> +  return _sysinfo =3D=3D NULL ? 0 : 1;

I hadn't noticed this in the syscall patches before, but I think
starting a name with "_" is mildly bad.  Those names are reserved for
the system.

Tom