From: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>
To: Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Trace state variables
Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:17:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m3hbrsnj2c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B279456.1010508@codesourcery.com> (Stan Shebs's message of "Tue, 15 Dec 2009 05:51:18 -0800")
>>>>> "Stan" == Stan Shebs <stan@codesourcery.com> writes:
Stan> Since internalvar handling has changed recently, I've left off the
Stan> value.c bit to make "print $foo" work.
Will this be forthcoming?
Stan> + case BINOP_ASSIGN:
It seems a little odd to add BINOP_ASSIGN but not BINOP_ASSIGN_MODIFY.
Stan> extern int remote_supports_cond_tracepoints (void);
Stan> + extern char *unpack_varlen_hex (char *buff, ULONGEST *result);
It seems like this could be in a header somewhere.
Stan> + /* The list of all trace state variables. We don't retain pointers to
Stan> + any of these for any reason - API is by name or number only - so it
Stan> + works to have a vector of objects. */
Stan> +
Stan> + VEC(tsv_s) *tvariables;
Stan> +
Stan> + /* The next integer to assign to a variable. */
Stan> +
Stan> + int next_tsv_number = 1;
It seems like these, plus some of the new functions, could be static.
It is hard to say for sure since I don't know what future patches might do.
Stan> + void
Stan> + trace_variable_command (char *args, int from_tty)
Stan> + {
[...]
Stan> + /* All the possible valid arguments are expressions. */
Stan> + expr = parse_expression (args);
Stan> + old_chain = make_cleanup (free_current_contents, &expr);
I think set_cmd_completer (..., expression_completer) is probably in
order, in the file's initialize function.
Stan> + void
Stan> + delete_trace_variable_command (char *args, int from_tty)
It would be nice to have a completer function for this.
Stan> + static void
Stan> + tvariables_info (char *args, int from_tty)
[...]
Stan> + printf_filtered (_("Name\t\t Initial\tCurrent\n"));
I think that brand-new formatted output should be done using the ui_out
machinery. Is there some drawback to doing that? I really don't
know... I would have expected ui_out to be used universally but instead
it seems somewhat random, and I don't know why. (I assume that whoever
was doing this transition ran out of steam... ?)
Stan> + typedef struct trace_state_variable tsv_s;
Stan> + DEF_VEC_O(tsv_s);
AFAICT, this VEC is only used in a single .c file. It is better to put
the DEF_VEC there, to avoid duplicating the static functions in other
compilation units where they aren't needed.
Tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-15 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-15 13:51 Stan Shebs
2009-12-15 15:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2009-12-15 19:04 ` Stan Shebs
2009-12-15 19:17 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2009-12-18 20:03 ` Stan Shebs
2009-12-18 20:47 ` Tom Tromey
2009-12-29 17:21 ` Stan Shebs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m3hbrsnj2c.fsf@fleche.redhat.com \
--to=tromey@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=stan@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox