From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-82465-listarch-gdb-patches=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 14440 invoked by alias); 20 Jul 2011 18:46:58 -0000
Received: (qmail 14432 invoked by uid 22791); 20 Jul 2011 18:46:58 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=5.0	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28)    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Jul 2011 18:46:24 +0000
Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23])	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KIfMKu008462	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK);	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:41:22 -0400
Received: from psique ([10.3.112.15])	by int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6KIf99b023983;	Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:41:17 -0400
From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@redhat.com>
To: Abhijit Halder <abhijit.k.halder@gmail.com>
Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>, Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,        gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: PATCH
References: <CAOhZP9x4GS=_3ShU3=0tKuqGL8K8H=iijh-gHHwRMQETOwhC-Q@mail.gmail.com>	<m37h7od2fk.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAOhZP9xxssgyoUuv05CVcA8RGkE1sDch+7fBet4dPiqk9fkejw@mail.gmail.com>	<CAOhZP9w83=FF6khgRnmhV8ZfwiNgkhgitJX3tJsk_-=MLG=-4g@mail.gmail.com>	<m3liw3gv2r.fsf@fleche.redhat.com>	<CAJaTeToAh4z=6sU3=z13hbMRi6n6tVM=wubqWHTsNbuK+Rw4iA@mail.gmail.com>	<CAOhZP9ynU6DvYGojD_O6KFu4m=jxmjaxTho58Ct5ZE9sr86H+A@mail.gmail.com>	<CAOhZP9wFida5yEsH3s-_QzHLoUR0L6=D4fkLyFF8C5ecfzrpqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2011 19:25:00 -0000
In-Reply-To: <CAOhZP9wFida5yEsH3s-_QzHLoUR0L6=D4fkLyFF8C5ecfzrpqA@mail.gmail.com>	(Abhijit Halder's message of "Fri, 15 Jul 2011 12:04:49 +0530")
Message-ID: <m3hb6gg5h9.fsf@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-IsSubscribed: yes
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gdb-patches.sourceware.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org>, <http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00560.txt.bz2

Abhijit Halder <abhijit.k.halder@gmail.com> writes:

> I have made the changes to handle following cases. Should I re-submit
> the new patch in the same thread, or I change the subject line (as it
> does not reveal much the problem definition) and re-submit the patch
> in a new thread?

Hello Abhijit,

As Tom said, either way is fine.  Also, please don't do top-posting when
replying e-mails, i.e., don't reply on top of the other messages.  We
prefer this style:

       http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

Please use it when you are replying to mailing lists in general.

Thank you.