From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17237 invoked by alias); 27 Jul 2011 17:33:31 -0000 Received: (qmail 17228 invoked by uid 22791); 27 Jul 2011 17:33:30 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:33:14 +0000 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6RHXD0I032019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:33:13 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6RHXDfq014755; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:33:13 -0400 Received: from barimba (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.9.1]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id p6RHXBRE018242; Wed, 27 Jul 2011 13:33:12 -0400 From: Tom Tromey To: Jan Kratochvil Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [help patch] whatis vs. ptype - the difference #2 References: <20110726213021.GA14823@host1.jankratochvil.net> <20110727171351.GA32153@host1.jankratochvil.net> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 17:41:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <20110727171351.GA32153@host1.jankratochvil.net> (Jan Kratochvil's message of "Wed, 27 Jul 2011 19:13:51 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2011-07/txt/msg00774.txt.bz2 >>>>> "Jan" == Jan Kratochvil writes: Jan> just noticed the original user confusion came from the GDB help; Jan> not from the GDB manual. So that it may be a bit pointed out Jan> there. Jan> Wording review welcomed. It reads ok to me. Tom