From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29918 invoked by alias); 8 Oct 2013 20:49:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 29905 invoked by uid 89); 8 Oct 2013 20:49:18 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-HELO: mx1.redhat.com Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:49:18 +0000 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r98KnFNU012016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:49:15 -0400 Received: from psique (ovpn-113-21.phx2.redhat.com [10.3.113.21]) by int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r98KnCu4031133 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 8 Oct 2013 16:49:14 -0400 From: Sergio Durigan Junior To: Tom Tromey Cc: jose.marchesi@oracle.com (Jose E. Marchesi), gdb-patches@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [SPARC64] Figure out where a longjmp will land References: <87y563k71b.fsf@oracle.com> <87d2nffr53.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> X-URL: http://www.redhat.com Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 20:49:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87d2nffr53.fsf@fleche.redhat.com> (Tom Tromey's message of "Tue, 08 Oct 2013 14:23:52 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2013-10/txt/msg00238.txt.bz2 On Tuesday, October 08 2013, Tom Tromey wrote: >>>>>> "Jose" == Jose E Marchesi writes: > > Jose> Note that in sparc64 glibc does not install probes in setjmp, nor it > Jose> mangles pointers. > > In this case adding the probes is marginal; but you will probably want > to write the probe support for sparc64 in gdb anyway, because there are > other probes available that provide more noticeable benefits... Let me know if you need some help with that. It shouldn't be hard to implement it, though. -- Sergio