From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24844 invoked by alias); 23 Mar 2009 18:14:51 -0000 Received: (qmail 24824 invoked by uid 22791); 23 Mar 2009 18:14:50 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx2.redhat.com (HELO mx2.redhat.com) (66.187.237.31) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:14:45 +0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (int-mx2.corp.redhat.com [172.16.27.26]) by mx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2NIEgqR014560; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:14:42 -0400 Received: from ns3.rdu.redhat.com (ns3.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.255.199]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n2NIEbc1012780; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:14:37 -0400 Received: from opsy.redhat.com (vpn-12-142.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.12.142]) by ns3.rdu.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n2NIEfSS022906; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:14:42 -0400 Received: by opsy.redhat.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 104563782B4; Mon, 23 Mar 2009 12:14:40 -0600 (MDT) To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: GDB Subject: Re: RFC: Support DW_TAG_entry_point References: <20090320220041.GA26894@lucon.org> <6dc9ffc80903210924i10a807f6n320d93ca23e07fef@mail.gmail.com> From: Tom Tromey Reply-To: tromey@redhat.com Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:26:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: <6dc9ffc80903210924i10a807f6n320d93ca23e07fef@mail.gmail.com> (H. J. Lu's message of "Sat\, 21 Mar 2009 09\:24\:31 -0700") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-03/txt/msg00504.txt.bz2 >>>>> "H.J." =3D=3D H J Lu writes: Tom> Yes. =C2=A0A rationale for the patch would also be helpful, at least t= o me. H.J.> DW_TAG_entry_point may be used by Fortran compiler. But gcc H.J.> doesn't use it. I guess one reason is gdb doesn't support it. Is H.J.> this good enough? Yeah. You also need that ChangeLog entry though... Tom